<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10... Q...</title>
	<atom:link href="http://meta.neojaponisme.com/2009/05/28/10-q/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://meta.neojaponisme.com/2009/05/28/10-q/</link>
	<description>a meta-blog for Néojaponisme</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:47:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://meta.neojaponisme.com/2009/05/28/10-q/comment-page-1/#comment-14133</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 04:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meta.neojaponisme.com/2009/05/28/10-q/#comment-14133</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the links, tomojiro, that&#039;s some good reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the links, tomojiro, that&#8217;s some good reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomojiro</title>
		<link>http://meta.neojaponisme.com/2009/05/28/10-q/comment-page-1/#comment-14089</link>
		<dc:creator>tomojiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 02:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meta.neojaponisme.com/2009/05/28/10-q/#comment-14089</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t read the newest Murakami book, but some serious review (in Japanese) why probably Murakami’s works are not just &quot;pop&quot; but something that must (probably) be more seriously considered as “literature”.

http://blog.tatsuru.com/2009/06/06_1907.php

http://d.hatena.ne.jp/kaikaji/20090612/p1#seemore</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t read the newest Murakami book, but some serious review (in Japanese) why probably Murakami’s works are not just &#8220;pop&#8221; but something that must (probably) be more seriously considered as “literature”.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.tatsuru.com/2009/06/06_1907.php" rel="nofollow">http://blog.tatsuru.com/2009/06/06_1907.php</a></p>
<p><a href="http://d.hatena.ne.jp/kaikaji/20090612/p1#seemore" rel="nofollow">http://d.hatena.ne.jp/kaikaji/20090612/p1#seemore</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bendall</title>
		<link>http://meta.neojaponisme.com/2009/05/28/10-q/comment-page-1/#comment-13089</link>
		<dc:creator>bendall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 02:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meta.neojaponisme.com/2009/05/28/10-q/#comment-13089</guid>
		<description>Second that, what a great idea. I love his boozy attitude and &#039;Yes we pan&#039; is funny. I approve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Second that, what a great idea. I love his boozy attitude and &#8216;Yes we pan&#8217; is funny. I approve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W. David MARX</title>
		<link>http://meta.neojaponisme.com/2009/05/28/10-q/comment-page-1/#comment-12969</link>
		<dc:creator>W. David MARX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meta.neojaponisme.com/2009/05/28/10-q/#comment-12969</guid>
		<description>I love the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

